As Skibidi Toilet grew into a global franchise, an ecosystem of fan creators grew alongside it. Animators making “fanmades”, editors creating tributes, and analysts creating breakdowns of both canon and fanmade episodes. All of which kept the world and fandom active between official releases from Alexey.
Creator Alliance
In 2024, Invisible Narratives began approaching Skibidi Toilet fan creators (analysts, editors, animators) about joining them in what they called the “Creator Alliance”. This “Creator Alliance” was represented as a way for selected creators to keep making Skibidi-related content with official permission, support, and protection from copyright issues. Invisible describes the Alliance as a “first-of-its-kind” arrangement, though in practice it functions much like a standard YouTube MCN, comparable to networks such as Machinima, with IP permissions layered on top.
Under the “Creator Alliance”, creators typically signed a contract and added their channel to a CMS with Invisible, meaning their revenue passed through Invisible before they received their cut. Depending on the contract, every Skibidi Toilet video the creator made could belong to Invisible. Creators also took on obligations, such as keeping most of their channel Skibidi-related, including merch ads, and including an affiliate link to merch. In return, they were promised access to exclusive information and spoilers. Though reportedly, these benefits were rare.
However, rather than an invitation, the offer often arrived directly alongside copyright threats, alongside actual strikes after not accepting the offer, and alongside warnings that creators’ channels were at risk. This made many creators affected view the “Creator Alliance” MCN more akin to a protection racket than an opportunity.
In the clearest cases the pattern appeared to represent a copyright strike threat or potential takedown, then an offer to resolve the situation through an agreement.
The cases described below document how that pressure played out in practice (this list is not exhaustive).
Dydder Floutin
On May 7, 2024, an Invisible Narratives employee contacted Skibidi Toilet fan animator Dydder Floutin. They described Invisible Narratives as “the official development representative of DaFuq!?Boom!“, said the company held “the trademarks and copyrights related to the Skibidi Toilet brand“, and said the company had reviewed Dydder’s channel.
The message frames the approach as support for a creator with potential, but it also made an explicit threat. “in lieu of copyright striking your channel,” Invisible wanted to schedule a meeting. Three days later, after Dydder had not responded, the employee followed up again. This time the message was more direct. “If I don’t hear back from you by the end of business tomorrow, I’ll have to begin striking your channel. Please respond.”
From these messages, it appears the ultimatum was to respond and enter their process on their terms, or the channel would begin receiving strikes. After not responding in time, Dydder later received multiple copyright takedowns.
YouTube emails show videos removed after copyright removal requests sent under the channel name “DaFuq!?Boom!”,. Several videos were included within in the same strikes. The strikes reached the threshold of 3, putting the channel at risk. When Dydder eventually responded over 10 days later apologising for not responding and thanking for the chance to avoid strikes, their correspondence moved to email.
Invisible described the situation as a chance to avoid problems with strikes, telling Dydder they were interested in collaboration and would retract the DMCA notices once an agreement was in place. Dydder apologized for missing Inviz’s messages and showed interest in a resolution.
The strikes were later removed on the 30th May.
After the strikes, Dydder was guided toward the Creator Alliance arrangement. In emails, Invisible described the Alliance as an exclusive program for selected Skibidi content channels, and that joining would help them avoid issues around unauthorized IP use while giving them access to opportunities connected to the official Skibidi Toilet ecosystem.
“Boom” is also named in connection – though according to members, it seems Alexey had little to no engagement with events within the Creator Alliance.
In the end, due to international considerations, rather than the standard licensing contract, Invisible offered Dydder a structure where they could continue using the Skibidi IP for free in exchange for placing pre-produced commercials and promotional videos into their content each month.
In the correspondence, Invisible described this loose arrangement as a “win-win”, where Dydder would continue making Skibidi content, and Invisible would promote through their channel. Dydder expressed concern that inserting too much advertising would hurt their channel retention, especially because they did not upload often. Invisible replied that they would work with them to find the best amount of commercials.
OneMoreAnimator
On October 4th 2024, multiple videos from OneMoreAnimator’s fanmade “ComputerVerse” series were removed through copyright strikes connected to Invisible Narratives (via the channel at the time still named “DaFuq!?Boom!”).
Once they subsequently got in contact, an Invisible employee later told OneMoreAnimator that Invisible had tried to reach them, not hearing back back, and that this was likely why the “legal team” struck him.
By this point videos had already been removed, and the solution offered was to speak with Invisible and join the Creator Alliance MCN.
The effects of the strikes continued into 2025, with an Invisible employee saying the strikes had happened earlier and that they were trying to resolve them so OneMoreAnimator could post again.
In leaked DMs, Alexey can be seen surprised that Invisible hadn’t released OneMoreAnimator’s strikes and requested more information in order to help.
ZacDoor
In October 2024, Skibidi Toilet fan animator ZacDoor’s channel received enough copyright strikes to face removal, with YouTube warning that the channel would be deleted if the strikes were not resolved.
ZacDoor subsequently received a legal letter from GreenRoom Legal, acting on behalf of Invisible Narratives. The letter stated that Invisible Narratives owned the Skibidi Toilet intellectual property, demanded that ZacDoor stop using Skibidi Toilet references, and warned that continued use could create serious financial liability.
The letter described the alleged infringing material broadly. One exhibit stated that “Infringing Property” included all references to Skibidi Toilet on the ZacDoor YouTube channel.
That resulted in ZacDoor’s channel facing multiple strikes, and potential deletion, with ZacDoor himself facing legal notices and financial threats, simply over his Skibidi-related fan videos.
ImSan
In October 2024 fan creator ImSan was contacted both by an Invisible Narratives employee with an offer to join the Creator alliance, and a connected community member emphasising the same message.
ImSan was first told via the employee that they could become an affiliate partner for “Boom’s upcoming product drop”, receive products, access the official Creator Alliance, and make money through affiliate links. This is another instance of Alexey’s name being used surrounding a primarily Invisible-led process.
ImSan declined to the Inviz employee. After that, a fan creator connected to the Alliance contacted ImSan and told them that Invisible had told them that ImSan declined, and that Invisible would issue a strike on their channel. The same creator told ImSan they “have to accept this or [Inviz] will strike [their] channel”. While that warning came through an intermediary, it shows how the Alliance was understood inside the creator network. The message being passed between creators was that joining the Alliance was how to avoid strikes.
Other examples
Another creator, who asked to remain anonymous, received a similar warning from an Invisible Narratives employee in November 2024.
According to the messages, they were previously told by the same fan creator who had contacted ImSan that their channel was at risk of being struck and the creator then contacted Invisible to ask what they should do to prevent it. The creator was asked whether they were producing original content, and they explained that they made edits related to Skibidi Toilet and had been listed as one of the creators at risk. The response was that they should discuss how to work together to prevent strikes.
Creators were directly told that they were at risk, and is then moved toward “working together” as the route to avoiding that same risk.
Creator Alliance Overview
In 2025, Invisible began sending an “overview” summary for the Benefits and Obligations of the Creator Alliance to new creators they were scouting.
The first benefit listed was “no strikes or claims against your channel”, with the remaining benefits list felt by creators to be inflated, with items of little value such as “exclusive ‘Skibidi Creator Alliance’ branding” or vague wording such as “support on increasing quality”.
Note: This is not a contract or legal agreement, it’s a summary document.
Invisible’s Response
Invisible’s stance is that the Alliance was not coercive because it offered creators permission to keep making Skibidi content. But that defence only works if the Alliance was genuinely voluntary and the strikes were independent of it. The examples above suggest neither was the case.
Invisible Narratives has also relied on the private business messages they leaked, suggesting Alexey trusted them to handle enforcement and approved of their continued action against channels.
The private business communication (published without Alexey’s permission in April 2026) took place in April 2024, where Alexey deferred to Invisible’s judgement on how to enforce the IP’s copyright on YouTube.
Many felt that Invisible sharing the private message appeared to function as a blame shift from the company (that already owned the rights to the IP via the original 2023 transfer), designed to give the impression they were only acting on Alexey’s wishes. However, rather than showing that this was Alexey’s own assertion and idea, this message appears to show Alexey deferring to Invisible’s judgement. Simply giving Invisible the go-ahead to do what they felt was “better for the brand”, indicating to prior discussion from Invisible about this subject which the public were not shown, possibly even floating the idea themselves. This excerpt does not conclude either way.
What this does show, is that in 2024 (and in contrast to now) Alexey trusted Invisible Narratives to make the right choices. In a separate private message to a community member from May 21, 2024 shows Alexey explicitly describing Invisible as a company he trusted, citing their connections to “very highly respected people” and to MrBeast representatives. He also said that, because of his migration situation, there was little more he could personally do in the US at the time.
Invisible can be seen appealing to prominent names and authority when approaching others for potential business opportunities.
That echoes the way Alexey’s name was used when recruiting Creator Alliance members, where association with a trusted figure helped lend credibility to the offer.
From early on in Skibidi Toilet’s development, Alexey had always appeared to support enforcement against exploitative uses of Skibidi Toilet IP, content farms, channels using the content in bad-faith, and material he didn’t want associated with the brand. Protecting an IP from exploitation isn’t inherently wrong, and the message Invisible produced shows a creator who, in early 2024, trusted them to handle it.
The message Invisible produced does not, on its own, prove that Alexey approved every enforcement decision. And it of course does not mean that Alexey oversaw or approved of every connected decision by Invisible, every Creator Alliance contract term, or every tactic used to pressure creators into Invisible’s system.
Whatever Alexey trusted them to do, the record of the repeated direct threats towards creators shows Invisible executing the problematic process which many fans feel was coercive. A specific process that despite the screenshots provided by Invisible, Alexey is not shown to be coordinating. Invisible contacted the creators. Invisible threatened strikes. After strikes, Invisible offered the retractions. Finally, Invisible routed people toward the Alliance, presented as the fix for a problem Invisible itself had created.
Next: Episode 79’s Issues